Paper detail

Gaussian process aided function comparison using noisy scattered data

This work proposes a nonparametric method to compare the underlying mean functions given two noisy datasets. The motivation for the work stems from an application of comparing wind turbine power curves. Comparing wind turbine data presents new problems, namely the need to identify the regions of difference in the input space and to quantify the extent of difference that is statistically significant. Our proposed method, referred to as funGP, estimates the underlying functions for different data samples using Gaussian process models. We build a confidence band using the probability law of the estimated function differences under the null hypothesis. Then, the confidence band is used for the hypothesis test as well as for identifying the regions of difference. This identification of difference regions is a distinct feature, as existing methods tend to conduct an overall hypothesis test stating whether two functions are different. Understanding the difference regions can lead to further practical insights and help devise better control and maintenance strategies for wind turbines. The merit of funGP is demonstrated by using three simulation studies and four real wind turbine datasets.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.