Paper detail

Gauss decomposition for Chevalley groups, revisited

In the 1960's Noboru Iwahori and Hideya Matsumoto, Eiichi Abe and Kazuo Suzuki, and Michael Stein discovered that Chevalley groups $G=G(Φ,R)$ over a semilocal ring admit remarkable Gauss decomposition $G=TUU^-U$, where $T=T(Φ,R)$ is a split maximal torus, whereas $U=U(Φ,R)$ and $U^-=U^-(Φ,R)$ are unipotent radicals of two opposite Borel subgroups $B=B(Φ,R)$ and $B^-=B^-(Φ,R)$ containing $T$. It follows from the classical work of Hyman Bass and Michael Stein that for classical groups Gauss decomposition holds under weaker assumptions such as $\sr(R)=1$ or $\asr(R)=1$. Later the second author noticed that condition $\sr(R)=1$ is necessary for Gauss decomposition. Here, we show that a slight variation of Tavgen's rank reduction theorem implies that for the elementary group $E(Φ,R)$ condition $\sr(R)=1$ is also sufficient for Gauss decomposition. In other words, $E=HUU^-U$, where $H=H(Φ,R)=T\cap E$. This surprising result shows that stronger conditions on the ground ring, such as being semi-local, $\asr(R)=1$, $\sr(R,Λ)=1$, etc., were only needed to guarantee that for simply connected groups $G=E$, rather than to verify the Gauss decomposition itself.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.