Paper detail

Gas-liquid Nucleation at Large Metastability

Nucleation at large metastability is still largely an unsolved problem, although is a problem of tremendous current interest, with wide practical value. It is well-accepted that the classical nucleation theory (CNT) fails to provide a qualitative picture and gives incorrect quantitative values for such quantities as activation free energy barrier and supersaturation dependence of nucleation rate, especially at large metastability. In this article, we present a powerful alternative formalism to treat nucleation at large supersaturation. This formalism goes over to the classical picture at small supersaturation where CNT is expected to be valid. The new theory is based on an extended set of order parameters in terms of k-th largest liquid-like clusters where k=1 is the largest cluster in the system, k=2 is the second largest cluster and so on. We derive an analytic expression for the free energy of formation of the k-th largest cluster which shows that at large metastability the barrier of growth for the few largest liquid-like clusters disappear, the nucleation becomes collective and the approach to the critical size occurs by barrierless diffusion in the cluster size space. The expression for the rate of barrier crossing predicts a weaker supersaturation dependence than that of CNT at large metastability. Such a cross-over behavior has indeed been observed in recent experiments but eluded an explanation till now. In order to understand the large numerical difference between simulation predictions and experimental results, we carried out a study of the dependence on the range of intermolecular interaction of both the surface tension of an equilibrium planar gas-liquid interface and the free energy barrier of nucleation. Both are found to depend significantly on the range of interaction for a Lennard-Jones potential, both in two and three dimensions.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.