Paper detail

GAPP: A Fast Profiler for Detecting Serialization Bottlenecks in Parallel Linux Applications

We present a parallel profiling tool, GAPP, that identifies serialization bottlenecks in parallel Linux applications arising from load imbalance or contention for shared resources . It works by tracing kernel context switch events using kernel probes managed by the extended Berkeley Packet Filter (eBPF) framework. The overhead is thus extremely low (an average 4% run time overhead for the applications explored), the tool requires no program instrumentation and works for a variety of serialization bottlenecks. We evaluate GAPP using the Parsec3.0 benchmark suite and two large open-source projects: MySQL and Nektar++ (a spectral/hp element framework). We show that GAPP is able to reveal a wide range of bottleneck-related performance issues, for example arising from synchronization primitives, busy-wait loops, memory operations, thread imbalance and resource contention.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.