Paper detail

Gap probability and full counting statistics in the one dimensional one-component plasma

We consider the $1d$ one-component plasma (OCP) in thermal equilibrium, consisting of $N$ equally charged particles on a line, with pairwise Coulomb repulsion and confined by an external harmonic potential. We study two observables: (i) the distribution of the gap between two consecutive particles in the bulk and (ii) the distribution of the number of particles $N_I$ in a fixed interval $I=[-L,+L]$ inside the bulk, the so-called full-counting-statistics (FCS). For both observables, we compute, for large $N$, the distribution of the typical as well as atypical large fluctuations. We show that the distribution of the typical fluctuations of the gap are described by the scaling form ${\cal P}_{\rm gap, bulk}(g,N) \sim N H_α(g\,N)$, where $α$ is the interaction coupling and the scaling function $H_α(z)$ is computed explicitly. It has a faster than Gaussian tail for large $z$: $H_α(z) \sim e^{-z^3/(96 α)}$ as $z \to \infty$. Similarly, for the FCS, we show that the distribution of the typical fluctuations of $N_I$ is described by the scaling form ${\cal P}_{\rm FCS}(N_I,N) \sim 2α\, U_α[2 α(N_I - \bar{N}_I)]$, where $\bar{N}_I = L\,N/(2 α)$ is the average value of $N_I$ and the scaling function $U_α(z)$ is obtained explicitly. For both observables, we show that the probability of large fluctuations are described by large deviations forms with respective rate functions that we compute explicitly. Our numerical Monte-Carlo simulations are in good agreement with our analytical predictions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.