Paper detail

Game of Privacy: Towards Better Federated Platform Collaboration under Privacy Restriction

Vertical federated learning (VFL) aims to train models from cross-silo data with different feature spaces stored on different platforms. Existing VFL methods usually assume all data on each platform can be used for model training. However, due to the intrinsic privacy risks of federated learning, the total amount of involved data may be constrained. In addition, existing VFL studies usually assume only one platform has task labels and can benefit from the collaboration, making it difficult to attract other platforms to join in the collaborative learning. In this paper, we study the platform collaboration problem in VFL under privacy constraint. We propose to incent different platforms through a reciprocal collaboration, where all platforms can exploit multi-platform information in the VFL framework to benefit their own tasks. With limited privacy budgets, each platform needs to wisely allocate its data quotas for collaboration with other platforms. Thereby, they naturally form a multi-party game. There are two core problems in this game, i.e., how to appraise other platforms' data value to compute game rewards and how to optimize policies to solve the game. To evaluate the contributions of other platforms' data, each platform offers a small amount of "deposit" data to participate in the VFL. We propose a performance estimation method to predict the expected model performance when involving different amount combinations of inter-platform data. To solve the game, we propose a platform negotiation method that simulates the bargaining among platforms and locally optimizes their policies via gradient descent. Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets show that our approach can effectively facilitate the collaborative exploitation of multi-platform data in VFL under privacy restrictions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.