Paper detail

Galton's Family Heights Data Revisited

Galton's family heights data has been a preeminent historical dataset in regression analysis, on which the original model and basic results have survived the close scrutiny of statisticians for 125 years. However by revisiting Galton's family data, we challenge whether Galton's classic model and his regression towards mean interpretation are proper. Using Galton's data as a benchmark for different regression methods, such as least squares, orthogonal regression, geometric mean regression, and least sine squares regression - a newly developed nonparametric robust regression approach, we elucidate that his regression model has fundamental drawbacks not only in variable and model selection by "transmuting" women into men thus the simple linear model, but also a strong bias in least squares regression leading to otherwise alternative conclusions on the true relationships between the heights of the child and his or her parents.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.