Paper detail

Further Results and Discussions on Random Cayley Graphs

Consider the random Cayley graph of a finite group $G$ with respect to $k$ generators chosen uniformly at random, with $1 \ll k \lesssim \log |G|$. The results of this article supplement those in the three main papers on random Cayley graphs. The majority of the results are inspired by a `universality' conjecture of Aldous and Diaconis (1985). To start, we study the limit profile of cutoff for the simple random walk on this random graph, as well as a detailed investigation into mixing properties when $G = \mathbb Z_p^d$ with $p$ prime. We then exposit a proof of Diaconis and Saloff-Coste (1994) establishing lack of cutoff when $k \asymp 1$. We move onto discussing material from our companion paper on matrix groups. We then study distance of a typical element of $G$ from the identity in an $L_q$-type graph distance in the Abelian set-up. Finally, we give necessary and sufficient conditions for $k$ independent uniform elements of $G$ to generate $G$, ie for the random Cayley graph to be connected, based on work of Pomerance (2001). The aforementioned results all hold with high probability over the random Cayley graph.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.