Paper detail

Fundamental Limits of Byzantine Agreement

Byzantine agreement (BA) is a distributed consensus problem where $n$ processors want to reach agreement on an $\ell$-bit message or value, but up to $t$ of the processors are dishonest or faulty. The challenge of this BA problem lies in achieving agreement despite the presence of dishonest processors who may arbitrarily deviate from the designed protocol. The quality of a BA protocol is measured primarily by using the following three parameters: the number of processors $n$ as a function of $t$ allowed (resilience); the number of rounds (round complexity, denoted by $r$); and the total number of communication bits (communication complexity, denoted by $b$). For any error-free BA protocol, the known lower bounds on those three parameters are $n\geq 3t+1$, $r\geq t+1$ and $b\geqΩ(\max\{n\ell, nt\})$, respectively, where a protocol that is guaranteed to be correct in all executions is said to be error free. In this work by using coding theory, together with graph theory and linear algebra, we design a coded BA protocol (termed as COOL) that achieves consensus on an $\ell$-bit message with optimal resilience, asymptotically optimal round complexity, and asymptotically optimal communication complexity when $\ell \geq t\log t$, simultaneously. The proposed COOL is an error-free and deterministic BA protocol that does not rely on cryptographic technique. It is secure against computationally unbounded adversary. With the achievable performance by the proposed COOL and the known lower bounds, we characterize the optimal communication complexity exponent as \[β^*(α,δ)=\max\{1+α,1+δ\}\] for $β= \lim_{n\to\infty}\log b/\log n$, $α=\lim_{n \to \infty} \log \ell/\log n$ and $δ=\lim_{n\to\infty} \log t/\log n$. This work reveals that coding is an effective approach for achieving the fundamental limits of Byzantine agreement and its variants.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.