Paper detail

Function + Action = Interaction

This article presents the mathematical background of general interactive systems. The first principle of designing a large system is to _divide and conquer_, which implies that we could possibly reduce human error if we divided a large system in smaller subsystems. Interactive systems are, however, often composed of many subsystems that are _organically_ connected to one another and thus difficult to divide. In other words, we cannot apply a framework of set theory to the programming of interactive systems. We can overcome this difficulty by applying a framework of category theory (Kleisli category) to the programming, but this requires highly abstract mathematics, which is not very popular. In this article we introduce the fundamental idea of category theory using only lambda calculus, and then demonstrate how it can be used in the practical design of an interactive system. Finally, we mention how this discussion relates to category theory.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.