Paper detail

Fully probabilistic quasar continua predictions near Lyman-α with conditional neural spline flows

Measurement of the red damping wing of neutral hydrogen in quasar spectra provides a probe of the epoch of reionization in the early Universe. Such quantification requires precise and unbiased estimates of the intrinsic continua near Lyman-$α$ (Ly$α$), a challenging task given the highly variable Ly$α$ emission profiles of quasars. Here, we introduce a fully probabilistic approach to intrinsic continua prediction. We frame the problem as a conditional density estimation task and explicitly model the distribution over plausible blue-side continua ($1190\ \unicode{xC5} \leq λ_{\text{rest}} < 1290\ \unicode{xC5}$) conditional on the red-side spectrum ($1290\ \unicode{xC5} \leq λ_{\text{rest}} < 2900\ \unicode{xC5}$) using normalizing flows. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art precision and accuracy, allows for sampling one thousand plausible continua in less than a tenth of a second, and can natively provide confidence intervals on the blue-side continua via Monte Carlo sampling. We measure the damping wing effect in two $z>7$ quasars and estimate the volume-averaged neutral fraction of hydrogen from each, finding $\bar{x}_\text{HI}=0.304 \pm 0.042$ for ULAS J1120+0641 ($z=7.09$) and $\bar{x}_\text{HI}=0.384 \pm 0.133$ for ULAS J1342+0928 ($z=7.54$).

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.