Paper detail

Fully Polynomial-Time Distributed Computation in Low-Treewidth Graphs

We consider global problems, i.e. problems that take at least diameter time, even when the bandwidth is not restricted. We show that all problems considered admit efficient solutions in low-treewidth graphs. By ``efficient'' we mean that the running time has polynomial dependence on the treewidth, a linear dependence on the diameter (which is unavoidable), and only a polylogarithmic dependence on $n$, the number of nodes in the graph. We present the algorithms solving the following problems in the CONGEST model which all attain $\tilde{O(τ^{O(1)}D)}$-round complexity (where $τ$ and $D$ denote the treewidth and diameter of the graph, respectively): (1) Exact single-source shortest paths (actually, the more general problem of computing a distance labeling scheme) for weighted and directed graphs, (2) exact bipartite unweighted maximum matching, and (3) the weighted girth for both directed and undirected graphs. We derive all of our results using a single unified framework, which consists of two novel technical ingredients, The first is a fully polynomial-time distributed tree decomposition algorithm, which outputs a decomposition of width $O(τ^2\log n)$ in $\tilde{O}(τ^{O(1)}D)$ rounds (where $n$ is the number of nodes in the graph). The second ingredient, and the technical highlight of this paper, is the novel concept of a \emph{stateful walk constraint}, which naturally defines a set of feasible walks in the input graph based on their local properties (e.g., augmenting paths). Given a stateful walk constraint, the constrained version of the shortest paths problem (or distance labeling) requires the algorithm to output the shortest \emph{constrained} walk (or its distance) for a given source and sink vertices. We show that this problem can be efficiently solved in the CONGEST model by reducing it to an \emph{unconstrained} version of the problem.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.