Paper detail

Fully-Asynchronous Fully-Implicit Variable-Order Variable-Timestep Simulation of Neural Networks

State-of-the-art simulations of detailed neural models follow the Bulk Synchronous Parallel execution model. Execution is divided in equidistant communication intervals, equivalent to the shortest synaptic delay in the network. Neurons stepping is performed independently, with collective communication guiding synchronization and exchange of synaptic events. The interpolation step size is fixed and chosen based on some prior knowledge of the fastest possible dynamics in the system. However, simulations driven by stiff dynamics or a wide range of time scales - such as multiscale simulations of neural networks - struggle with fixed step interpolation methods, yielding excessive computation of intervals of quasi-constant activity, inaccurate interpolation of periods of high volatility solution, and being incapable of handling unknown or distinct time constants. A common alternative is the usage of adaptive stepping methods, however they have been deemed inefficient in parallel executions due to computational load imbalance at the synchronization barriers that characterize the BSP execution model. We introduce a distributed fully-asynchronous execution model that removes global synchronization, allowing for longer variable timestep interpolations. Asynchronicity is provided by active point-to-point communication notifying neurons' time advancement to synaptic connectivities. Time stepping is driven by scheduled neuron advancements based on synaptic delays across neurons, yielding an "exhaustive yet not speculative" adaptive-step execution. Execution benchmarks on 64 Cray XE6 compute nodes demonstrate a reduced number of interpolation steps, higher numerical accuracy and lower time to solution, compared to state-of-the-art methods. Efficiency is shown to be activity-dependent, with scaling of the algorithm demonstrated on a simulation of a laboratory experiment.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.