Paper detail

Full absorption statistics of diffusing particles with exclusion

Suppose that an infinite lattice gas of constant density $n_0$, whose dynamics are described by the symmetric simple exclusion process, is brought in contact with a spherical absorber of radius $R$. Employing the macroscopic fluctuation theory and assuming the additivity principle, we evaluate the probability distribution ${\mathcal P}(N)$ that $N$ particles are absorbed during a long time $T$. The limit of $N=0$ corresponds to the survival problem, whereas $N\gg \bar{N}$ describes the opposite extreme. Here $\bar{N}=4πR D_0 n_0 T$ is the \emph{average} number of absorbed particles (in three dimensions), and $D_0$ is the gas diffusivity. For $n_0\ll 1$ the exclusion effects are negligible, and ${\mathcal P}(N)$ can be approximated, for not too large $N$, by the Poisson distribution with mean $\bar{N}$. For finite $n_0$, ${\mathcal P}(N)$ is non-Poissonian. We show that $-\ln{\mathcal P}(N) \simeq n_0 N^2/\bar{N}$ at $N\gg \bar{N}$. At sufficiently large $N$ and $n_0<1/2$ the most likely density profile of the gas, conditional on the absorption of $N$ particles, is non-monotonic in space. We also establish a close connection between this problem and that of statistics of current in finite open systems.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.