Paper detail

Frustrated ground states of a generalized XY model and their mapping to non-magnetic structural analogues

Ground state phases of a generalized XY model with magnetic and generalized nematic couplings on a non-bipartite triangular lattice are investigated in the exchange interactions parameter space. We demonstrate that the model displays a number of ordered and quasi-ordered phases as a result of geometrical frustration and/or competition between the magnetic and generalized nematic interactions. The nature and the extent of the respective phases depend on the parameter $q$, characterizing the higher-order harmonics term in the Hamiltonian. Motivated by the recent discovery of the experimental realization of the model with $q=2$ in the seemingly unrelated field of the systems chemistry [A.B. Cairns et al., Nature Chemistry 8, 442 (2016)], the model for $q>2$ is discussed in the context of the prediction of structural phases of a class of bimetalic cyanides based on a mapping between the two systems.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.