Paper detail

From Observed Viability to Internal Predictive Approximation: A Single-Subject Latent-Space Analysis of Gait Dynamics Under Occlusal Constraint

Adaptive biomechanical systems may show similar observable gait performance while differing in latent organization and longitudinal behavior. This study examines whether an observed longitudinal transformation of gait organization can be approximated within a predictive latent-space framework, without claiming clinical prediction or causal occlusal effects. Using an exploratory single-subject design in a Parkinsonian participant, gait was recorded with instrumented insoles during two sessions separated by eleven weeks. Six occlusal observational probes were tested: natural occlusion, open-mouth disengagement, strong clenching, two vertical-dimension increases in centric relation, and one vertical-dimension increase with mandibular protrusion. Principal Component Analysis was used to construct a PC1--PC2 latent representation. A simplified supervised machine-learning model, implemented as a feed-forward neural network, was trained to approximate the observed M1--M2 transformation. The primary analysis focused on the three centric-relation conditions and tested whether the displacement hierarchy could be reproduced. The model preserved the ordering OC3 < ONL < OC2.5. The extended six-probe analysis also preserved the global structure of the exploratory displacement pattern, with OC3 and OC3P closely grouped and the highest displacements associated with OC2.5 and open-mouth disengagement. Held-out M2 and leave-condition-out analyses showed condition-dependent approximation variability. These findings do not establish generalizable prediction, therapeutic superiority, causal occlusal effects, or clinical viability forecasting. They support only the restricted conclusion that observed longitudinal latent transformations can be internally approximated within this single-subject dataset, providing a methodological bridge toward future multi-subject predictive viability models.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.