Paper detail

From Full and Partial Intraoral Scans to Crown Proposal: A Classification-Guided Restoration Assistance Pipeline

Single-unit crown restoration is among the most common procedures in clinical dentistry, with CAD/CAM workflows now designing crowns directly from intraoral scans. Partial scans are often preferred over full-arch scans for single-unit cases due to fewer stitching errors, yet most segmentation networks trained on full arches fail on partial scans, while end-to-end generative crown methods often produce over-smoothed surfaces that lose occlusal detail. We propose an end-to-end pipeline that takes a raw intraoral scan and target FDI tooth number as input and outputs an initial, patient-specific crown proposal for clinician refinement. The pipeline has three phases: (I) data preparation and pose standardization; (II) segmentation routed by scan type; and (III) crown proposal generation via context-aware retrieval and Blender-based fitting. We address partial-scan segmentation through a classify-then-align strategy: a DGCNN classifier categorizes the scan into one of five anatomical types, then coarse-to-fine RANSAC+ICP registration standardizes the jaw coordinate frame, followed by graph-cut optimization to refine tooth-gingival boundaries. Trained on 1,958 partial scans, the pipeline achieves macro-average DSC 0.9249, Recall 0.8919, and Precision 0.9615 across 17 semantic classes; a fine-tuned full-arch model reaches DSC 0.9347. The prepared tooth and its mesial and distal neighbors achieve DSC 0.9468-0.9569 with sub-millimeter Centroid Errors (0.2666-0.2774 mm). These centroids anchor a retrieval module using DGCNN embeddings and cosine similarity over neighboring and opposing teeth, followed by spline-guided alignment and Blender Python API refinement. The pipeline produces a preliminary crown shell in 2.5-3.5 minutes, offering a practical alternative to end-to-end generative approaches.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.