Paper detail

From Friedel oscillations and Kondo effect to the pseudogap in cuprates

One of the great achievements performed by Jacques Friedel in France has been to promote experimental activities on the electronic properties in condensed matter physics, which has led him, among others, to be an active promoter of the up-rise of the "Laboratoire de Physique des Solides" (LPS). A selective presentation of some of the work achieved in my Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) group allows me to underline the importance of the initial choices done by J. Friedel for the LPS. I give here an updated review of the work done on Kondo effect in the 1970's which has allowed me to enlighten the real interest of the NMR probe as a local experimental technique to visualize the perturbation brought by impurities in normal metals. In a second part I summarize the early NMR experiments done in the high Tc cuprates which have given evidence for the existence of strong electronic correlations and established the occurrence of the "pseudogap", on which I have initially had some exchanges with J. Friedel. The pseudogap, occurring below a temperature T*, has during the last twenty years raised endless discussions about the incidence of correlations on superconductivity. Many researchers are still advocating today that the pseudogap is due to the existence of preformed pairs above Tc. Its robustness to impurities and disorder that we evidenced from the early days rather suggested that it results from a competing order of the correlated state. This is apparently better accepted nowadays, although various distinct ordered states detected below T* are not yet understood. I also underline the large contrast between the scientific behaviours which prevailed between these two periods of scientific activity. I suggest that these changes might have a negative incidence, in my opinion, on the research and education system, at least in our field of science.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.