Paper detail

Frequency domain kurtosis-based no-reference image quality assessment for bright-field microscopy images

In the last few years, image processing researchers spent a substantial amount of time and effort developing and perfecting image quality assessment algorithms. Bright-field microscopy, for example, produces images whose quality is a bottleneck for consistent evaluation. For instance, when a stack of images of a specimen is acquired in different focal plane configurations, there will be a set of blurred or partially blurred elements in it, impairing proper evaluation. This work aims to provide an image quality assessment metric, without the presence of a reference image for comparison, to detect the blurred and sharp images among the whole set of the stack, and elect the sharpest ones for a further fusion process. The correlation of the results with subjective labeling of the image sets showed that the proposed metric offers reliable identification of the eligible images for fusion and suggests the application in other real-world problems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.