Paper detail

Fragmentation properties of two-dimensional Proximity Graphs considering random failures and targeted attacks

The pivotal quality of proximity graphs is connectivity, i.e. all nodes in the graph are connected to one another either directly or via intermediate nodes. These types of graphs are robust, i.e., they are able to function well even if they are subject to limited removal of elementary building blocks, as it may occur for random failures or targeted attacks. Here, we study how the structure of these graphs is affected when nodes get removed successively until an extensive fraction is removed such that the graphs fragment. We study different types of proximity graphs for various node removal strategies. We use different types of observables to monitor the fragmentation process, simple ones like number and sizes of connected components, and more complex ones like the hop diameter and the backup capacity, which is needed to make a network N-1 resilient. The actual fragmentation turns out to be described by a second order phase transition. Using finite-size scaling analyses we numerically assess the threshold fraction of removed nodes, which is characteristic for the particular graph type and node deletion scheme, that suffices to decompose the underlying graphs.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.