Paper detail

Formal guarantees for heuristic optimization algorithms used in machine learning

Recently, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) and its variants have become the dominant methods in the large-scale optimization of machine learning (ML) problems. A variety of strategies have been proposed for tuning the step sizes, ranging from adaptive step sizes to heuristic methods to change the step size in each iteration. Also, momentum has been widely employed in ML tasks to accelerate the training process. Yet, there is a gap in our theoretical understanding of them. In this work, we start to close this gap by providing formal guarantees to a few heuristic optimization methods and proposing improved algorithms. First, we analyze a generalized version of the AdaGrad (Delayed AdaGrad) step sizes in both convex and non-convex settings, showing that these step sizes allow the algorithms to automatically adapt to the level of noise of the stochastic gradients. We show for the first time sufficient conditions for Delayed AdaGrad to achieve almost sure convergence of the gradients to zero. Moreover, we present a high probability analysis for Delayed AdaGrad and its momentum variant in the non-convex setting. Second, we analyze SGD with exponential and cosine step sizes, which are empirically successful but lack theoretical support. We provide the very first convergence guarantees for them in the smooth and non-convex setting, with and without the Polyak-Łojasiewicz (PL) condition. We also show their good property of adaptivity to noise under the PL condition. Third, we study the last iterate of momentum methods. We prove the first lower bound in the convex setting for the last iterate of SGD with constant momentum. Moreover, we investigate a class of Follow-The-Regularized-Leader-based momentum algorithms with increasing momentum and shrinking updates. We show that their last iterate has optimal convergence for unconstrained convex stochastic optimization problems.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.