Paper detail

ForeSight: Reducing SWAPs in NISQ Programs via Adaptive Multi-Candidate Evaluations

Near-term quantum computers are noisy and have limited connectivity between qubits. Compilers are required to introduce SWAP operations in order to perform two-qubit gates between non-adjacent qubits. SWAPs increase the number of gates and depth of programs, making them even more vulnerable to errors. Moreover, they relocate qubits which affect SWAP selections for future gates in a program. Thus, compilers must select SWAP routes that not only minimize the overheads for the current operation, but also for future gates. Existing compilers tend to select paths with the fewest SWAPs for the current operations, but do not evaluate the impact of the relocations from the selected SWAP candidate on future SWAPs. Also, they converge on SWAP candidates for the current operation and only then decide SWAP routes for future gates, thus severely restricting the SWAP candidate search space for future operations. We propose ForeSight, a compiler that simultaneously evaluates multiple SWAP candidates for several operations into the future, delays SWAP selections to analyze their impact on future SWAP decisions and avoids early convergence on sub-optimal candidates. Moreover, ForeSight evaluates slightly longer SWAP routes for current operations if they have the potential to reduce SWAPs for future gates, thus reducing SWAPs for the program globally. As compilation proceeds, ForeSight dynamically adds new SWAP candidates to the solution space and eliminates the weaker ones. This allows ForeSight to reduce SWAP overheads at program-level while keeping the compilation complexity tractable. Our evaluations with a hundred benchmarks across three devices show that ForeSight reduces SWAP overheads by 17% on average and 81% in the best-case, compared to the baseline. ForeSight takes minutes, making it scalable to large programs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.