Paper detail

Foothold Evaluation Criterion for Dynamic Transition Feasibility for Quadruped Robots

To traverse complex scenarios reliably a legged robot needs to move its base aided by the ground reaction forces, which can only be generated by the legs that are momentarily in contact with the ground. A proper selection of footholds is crucial for maintaining balance. In this paper, we propose a foothold evaluation criterion that considers the transition feasibility for both linear and angular dynamics to overcome complex scenarios. We devise convex and nonlinear formulations as a direct extension of the Continuous Convex Resolution of Centroidal Dynamic Trajectories (C-CROC) in a receding-horizon fashion to grant dynamic feasibility for future behaviours. The criterion is integrated with a Vision-based Foothold Adaptation (VFA) strategy that takes into account the robot kinematics, leg collisions and terrain morphology. We verify the validity of the selected footholds and the generated trajectories in simulation and experiments with the 90kg quadruped robot HyQ.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.