Paper detail

Followers or Phantoms? An Anatomy of Purchased Twitter Followers

Online Social Media (OSM) is extensively used by contemporary Internet users to communicate, socialize and disseminate information. This has led to the creation of a distinct online social identity which in turn has created the need of online social reputation management techniques. A significant percentage of OSM users utilize various methods to drive and manage their reputation on OSM. This has given rise to underground markets which buy/sell fraudulent accounts, `likes', `comments' (Facebook, Instagram) and `followers' (Twitter) to artificially boost their social reputation. In this study, we present an anatomy of purchased followers on Twitter and their behaviour. We illustrate in detail the profile characteristics, content sharing and behavioural patterns of purchased follower accounts. Previous studies have analyzed the purchased follower markets and customers. Ours is the first study which analyzes the anatomy of purchased followers accounts. Some of the key insights of our study show that purchased followers have a very high unfollow entropy rate and low social engagement with their friends. In addition, we noticed that purchased follower accounts have significant difference in their interaction and content sharing patterns in comparison to random Twitter users. We also found that underground markets do not follow their service policies and guarantees they provide to customer. Our study highlights the key identifiers for suspicious follow behaviour. We then built a supervised learning mechanism to predict suspicious follower behaviour with 88.2% accuracy. We believe that understanding the anatomy and characteristics of purchased followers can help detect suspicious follower behaviour and fraudulent accounts to a larger extent.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.