Paper detail

Fluctuation-dissipation relations far from equilibrium

The fluctuation-dissipation (F-D) theorem is a fundamental result for systems near thermodynamic equilibrium, and justifies studies between microscopic and macroscopic properties. It states that the nonequilibrium relaxation dynamics is related to the spontaneous fluctuation at equilibrium. Most processes in Nature are out of equilibrium, for which we have limited theory. Common wisdom believes the F-D theorem is violated in general for systems far from equilibrium. Recently we show that dynamics of a dissipative system described by stochastic differential equations can be mapped to that of a thermostated Hamiltonian system, with a nonequilibrium steady state of the former corresponding to the equilibrium state of the latter. Her we derived the corresponding F-D theorem, and tested with several examples. We suggest further studies exploiting the analogy between a general dissipative system appearing in various science branches and a Hamiltonian system. Especially we discussed the implications of this work on biological network studies.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.