Paper detail

Fluctuating defects in the incipient relaxor K$_{1-x}$Li$_x$TaO$_3$ (x=0.02)

We report neutron scattering measurements of the structural correlations associated with the apparent relaxor transition in K$_{1-x}$Li$_x$TaO$_3$ for $x=0.02$ (KLT(0.02)). This compound displays a broad and frequency-dependent peak in the dielectric permittivity, which is the accepted hallmark of all relaxors. However, no evidence of elastic diffuse scattering or any soft mode anomaly is observed in KLT(0.02) [J. Wen et al., Phys. Rev. B 78, 144202 (2008)], a situation that diverges from that in other relaxors such as PbMg$_{1/3}$Nb$_{2/3}$O$_3$. We resolve this dichotomy by showing that the structural correlations associated with the transition in KLT(0.02) are purely dynamic at all temperatures, having a timescale on the order of $\sim$THz. These fluctuations are overdamped, non-propagating, and spatially uncorrelated. Identical measurements made on pure KTaO$_3$ show that they are absent (within experimental error) in the undoped parent material. They exhibit a temperature dependence that correlates well with the dielectric response, which suggests that they are associated with local ferroelectric regions induced by the Li$^+$ doping. The ferroelectric transition that is induced by the introduction of Li$^+$ cations is therefore characterized by quasistatic fluctuations, which represents a stark contrast to the soft harmonic-mode-driven transition observed in conventional perovskite ferroelectrics like PbTiO$_3$. The dynamic, glass-like, structural correlations in KLT(0.02) are much faster than those measured in random-field-based lead-based relaxors, which exhibit a frequency scale of order of $\sim$GHz and are comparatively better correlated spatially. Our results support the view that random fields give rise to the relaxor phenomena, and that the glass-like dynamics observed here characterize a nascent response.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.