Paper detail

Flow-plane decorrelations in heavy-ion collisions with multiple-plane cumulants

The azimuthal correlations between local flow planes at different (pseudo)rapidities ($η$) may reveal important details of the initial nuclear matter density distributions in heavy-ion collisions. Extensive experimental measurements of a factorization ratio ($r_2$) and its derivative ($F_2$) have shown evidence of the longitudinal flow-plane decorrelation. However, nonflow effects also affect this observable and prevent a quantitative understanding of the phenomenon. In this paper, to distinguish decorrelation and nonflow effects, we propose a new cumulant observable, $T_2$, which largely suppresses nonflow. The technique sensitivity to different initial-state scenarios and nonflow effects are tested with a simple Monte Carlo model, and in the end, the method is applied to events simulated by a multiphase transport model (AMPT) for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} =200$ GeV. We also emphasize that a distinct decorrelation signal requires not only the right sign of an observable, but also its proper dependence on the $η$-window of the reference flow plane, to be consistent with the pertinent decorrelation picture.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.