Paper detail

Flow-based Alignment Approaches for Probability Measures in Different Spaces

Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) is a powerful tool to compare probability measures whose supports are in different metric spaces. GW suffers however from a computational drawback since it requires to solve a complex non-convex quadratic program. We consider in this work a specific family of cost metrics, namely \textit{tree metrics} for a space of supports of each probability measure, and aim for developing efficient and scalable discrepancies between the probability measures. By leveraging a tree structure, we propose to align \textit{flows} from a root to each support instead of pair-wise tree metrics of supports, i.e., flows from a support to another, in GW. Consequently, we propose a novel discrepancy, named Flow-based Alignment (\FlowAlign), by matching the flows of the probability measures. We show that \FlowAlign~shares a similar structure as a univariate optimal transport distance. Therefore, \FlowAlign~is fast for computation and scalable for large-scale applications. By further exploring tree structures, we propose a variant of \FlowAlign, named Depth-based Alignment (\DepthAlign), by aligning the flows hierarchically along each depth level of the tree structures. Theoretically, we prove that both \FlowAlign~and \DepthAlign~are pseudo-distances. Moreover, we also derive tree-sliced variants, computed by averaging the corresponding \FlowAlign~/ \DepthAlign~using random tree metrics, built adaptively in spaces of supports. Empirically, we test our proposed discrepancies against other baselines on some benchmark tasks.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.