Paper detail

Flexible Extreme Value Inference And Hill Plots For A Small, Mid And Large Samples

Asymptotic normality of extreme value tail estimators received much attention in the literature, giving rise to increasingly complicated 2nd order regularity conditions. However, such conditions are really difficult to be checked for real data. Especially it is difficult or impossible to check such conditions using small samples. Beside that most of those conditions suffer from the drawback of a potentially singular integral representations. However, we can have various orders of approximation by normal distributions, e.g. Berry-Essen Types and Edgeworth types. In this paper we indicate that for Berry-Essen Types of normal approximation and related asymptotic normality of generalized Hill estimators, we do not necessarily need 2nd order regularity conditions and we can apply only Karamata's representation for regularly varying tails. 2nd order regularity conditions however better relates to Edgeworth types of normal approximations, albeit requiring larger data samples for their proper check. Finally both expansions are prone for bootstrap and other subsampling techniques. All existing results indicate that proper representation of tail behavior play a special and somewhat intriguing role in that context. We dispel that widespread opinion by providing a full characterization and representation, in a general regular variation context, of the integral singularity phenomenon, highlighting its relation to an asymptotical normality of the Generalized Hill estimator without the 2nd order condition. Thus application of this new methodology is simple and much more flexible, optimal for real data sets. Alternative and powerful versions of the Hill plot are also introduced and illustrated on ecological data of snow extremes from Slovakia.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.