Paper detail

Flavor changing neutral current processes in $B$ and $K$ decays in the supergravity model

Flavor changing neutral current processes such as $b \to s γ$, $b \to s l^+ l^-$, $b \to s ν\barν$, $ε_K$, $Δm_B$, $K^+ \to π^+ ν\barν$ and $\K_L \to π^0 ν\barν$ are calculated in the supersymmetric standard model based on supergravity. We consider two assumptions for the soft supersymmetry breaking terms. In the minimal case soft breaking terms for all scalar fields are taken to be universal at the GUT scale whereas those terms are different for the squark/slepton sector and the Higgs sector in the nonminimal case. In the calculation we have taken into account the next-to-leading order QCD correction to the $b \to s γ$ branching ratio, the results from the LEP II superparticles search, and the condition of the radiative electroweak symmetry breaking. We show that $Δm_B$ and $ε_K$ can be enhanced up to 40% compared to the Standard Model values in the nonminimal case. In the same parameter region the $b \to s ν\barν$, $K^+ \to π^+ ν\barν$ and $\K_L \to π^0 ν\barν$ branching ratios are reduced up to 10%. The corresponding deviation in the minimal case is 20% for $Δm_B$ and $ε_K$ and within 3% for the $b \to s ν\barν$, $K^+ \to π^+ ν\barν$ and $\K_L \to π^0 ν\barν$. For the $b \to s l^+ l^-$ process the significant deviation from the Standard Model is realized only when the $b \to s γ$ amplitude has an opposite sign to the Standard Model prediction. Significance on these results from possible future improvements of the $b \to s γ$ branching ratio measurement and top squark search is discussed.

preprint1998arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.