Paper detail

Flat histogram method comparison on 2D Ising Model

We compare the convergence of several flat-histogram methods applied to the 2D Ising model, including the recently introduced stochastic approximation with a dynamic update factor (SAD) method. We compare this method with the Wang-Landau (WL) method, the $1/t$ variant of the WL method, and standard stochastic approximation Monte Carlo (SAMC). In addition, we consider a procedure WL followed by a "production run" with fixed weights that refines the estimation of the entropy. To our knowledge, this work is the first to test this approach against other methods. We find that WL followed by a production run \emph{does} converge to the true density of states, in contrast to pure WL. Three of the methods converge robustly: SAD, $1/t$-WL, and WL followed by a production run. Of these, SAD does not require \emph{a priori} knowledge of the energy range. This work also shows that WL followed by a production run performs superior to other forms of WL while ensuring both ergodicity and detailed balance.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.