Paper detail

Fitting three-dimensional Laguerre tessellations by hierarchical marked point process models

We present a general statistical methodology for analysing a Laguerre tessellation data set viewed as a realization of a marked point process model. In the first step, for the points we use a nested sequence of multiscale processes which constitute a flexible parametric class of pairwise interaction point process models. In the second step, for the marks/radii conditioned on the points we consider various exponential family models where the canonical sufficient statistic is based on tessellation characteristics. For each step parameter estimation based on maximum pseudolikelihood methods is tractable. Model checking is performed using global envelopes and corresponding tests in the first step and by comparing observed and simulated tessellation characteristics in the second step. We apply our methodology for a 3D Laguerre tessellation data set representing the microstructure of a polycrystalline metallic material, where simulations under a fitted model may substitute expensive laboratory experiments.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.