Paper detail

Fitting Multilinear Polynomials for Logic Gate Networks

We study learnable logic gate networks that stack layers of 2-input Boolean gates to build combinational circuits. Every 2-input gate has a unique multilinear polynomial with 4 coefficients, so the 16 Boolean gates form a codebook of prototypes in a 4-dimensional space, reducing training to a vector-quantization problem. The baseline method, Soft-Mix, learns a 16-dimensional softmax over gate identities, but the codebook has rank~4: 11 of 15 simplex directions carry nullspace gradient, and at uniform initialization the backward signal vanishes exactly. We prove that no affine product reparameterization fixes the resulting interaction-coefficient starvation under STE, and show that the covariance Jacobian of soft-VQ selection bypasses it by coupling the starved coefficient to the always-active constant channel. Working in the 4-dimensional polynomial space reduces each neuron from 16 to 4 parameters. On seven datasets, at least one 4-parameter method matches or exceeds Soft-Mix on every dataset; the CovJac advantage over STE grows monotonically with interaction demand across all seven datasets. At depth, Soft-Mix collapses ($-37.3$pp on CIFAR-10 at 12 layers) while CovJac holds ($-0.5$pp on CIFAR-10, stable on MNIST).

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.