Paper detail

First Test of Lorentz Violation with a Reactor-based Antineutrino Experiment

We present a search for Lorentz violation with 8249 candidate electron antineutrino events taken by the Double Chooz experiment in 227.9 live days of running. This analysis, featuring a search for a sidereal time dependence of the events, is the first test of Lorentz invariance using a reactor-based antineutrino source. No sidereal variation is present in the data and the disappearance results are consistent with sidereal time independent oscillations. Under the Standard-Model Extension (SME), we set the first limits on fourteen Lorentz violating coefficients associated with transitions between electron and tau flavor, and set two competitive limits associated with transitions between electron and muon flavor.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
Double Chooz CollaborationY. AbeC. AberleJ. C. dos AnjosM. BergevinA. BernsteinT. J. C. BezerraL. BezrukhovE. BlucherN. S. BowdenC. BuckJ. BusenitzA. CabreraE. CadenL. CamilleriR. CarrM. CerradaP. -J. ChangP. ChimentiT. ClassenA. P. CollinE. ConoverJ. M. ConradJ. I. Crespo-AnadónK. CrumA. CucoanesM. V. D'AgostinoE. DamonJ. V. DawsonS. DazeleyD. DietrichZ. DjurcicM. DracosV. DurandJ. EbertY. EfremenkoM. ElnimrA. EricksonM. FallotM. FechnerF. von FeilitzschJ. FeldeV. FischerD. FrancoA. J. FrankeM. FrankeH. FurutaR. GamaI. Gil-BotellaL. GiotM. Göger-NeffL. F. G. GonzalezM. C. GoodmanJ. TM. GoonD. GreinerN. HaagS. HabibC. HagnerT. HaraF. X. HartmannJ. HaserA. HatzikoutelisT. HayakawaM. HofmannG. A. Horton-SmithM. IshitsukaJ. JochumC. JolletC. L. JonesF. KaetherL. N. KalousisY. KamyshkovD. M. KaplanT. KatoriT. KawasakiG. KeeferE. KempH. de KerretT. KonnoD. KrynM. KuzeT. LachenmaierC. E. LaneT. LasserreA. LetourneauD. LhuillierH. P. Lima JrM. LindnerJ. M. López-CastañoJ. M. LoSeccoB. K. LubsandorzhievS. LuchtD. McKeeJ. MaedaC. N. MaesanoC. MarianiJ. MaricicJ. MartinoT. MatsubaraG. MentionA. MeregagliaM. MeyerT. MileticR. MilincicH. MiyataTh. A. MuellerY. NagasakaK. NakajimaP. NovellaM. ObolenskyL. OberauerA. OnillonA. OsbornI. OstrovskiyC. PalomaresI. M. PepeS. PerassoP. PerrinP. PfahlerA. PortaW. PotzelG. PronostJ. ReichenbacherB. ReinholdA. RemotoM. RöhlingR. RoncinS. RothB. RyboltY. SakamotoR. SantorelliF. SatoS. SchönertS. SchoppmannT. SchwetzM. H. ShaevitzD. ShresthaJ. -L. SidaV. SinevM. SkorokhvatovE. SmithJ. SpitzA. StahlI. StancuL. F. F. StokesM. StraitA. StükenF. SuekaneS. SukhotinT. SumiyoshiY. SunK. TeraoA. TonazzoM. ToupsH. H. Trinh ThiG. ValdiviessoC. VeyssiereS. WagnerH. WatanabeB. WhiteC. WiebuschL. WinslowM. WorcesterM. WurmE. YanovitchF. YermiaV. Zimmer
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Double Chooz CollaborationY. AbeC. AberleJ. C. dos AnjosM. BergevinA. BernsteinT. J. C. BezerraL. BezrukhovE. BlucherN. S. BowdenC. BuckJ. BusenitzA. CabreraE. CadenL. CamilleriR. CarrM. CerradaP. -J. ChangP. ChimentiT. ClassenA. P. CollinE. ConoverJ. M. ConradJ. I. Crespo-AnadónK. CrumA. CucoanesM. V. D'AgostinoE. DamonJ. V. DawsonS. DazeleyD. DietrichZ. DjurcicM. DracosV. DurandJ. EbertY. EfremenkoM. ElnimrA. EricksonM. FallotM. FechnerF. von FeilitzschJ. FeldeV. FischerD. FrancoA. J. FrankeM. FrankeH. FurutaR. GamaI. Gil-BotellaL. GiotM. Göger-NeffL. F. G. GonzalezM. C. GoodmanJ. TM. GoonD. GreinerN. HaagS. HabibC. HagnerT. HaraF. X. HartmannJ. HaserA. HatzikoutelisT. HayakawaM. HofmannG. A. Horton-SmithM. IshitsukaJ. JochumC. JolletC. L. JonesF. KaetherL. N. KalousisY. KamyshkovD. M. KaplanT. KatoriT. KawasakiG. KeeferE. KempH. de KerretT. KonnoD. KrynM. KuzeT. LachenmaierC. E. LaneT. LasserreA. LetourneauD. LhuillierH. P. Lima JrM. LindnerJ. M. López-CastañoJ. M. LoSeccoB. K. LubsandorzhievS. LuchtD. McKeeJ. MaedaC. N. MaesanoC. MarianiJ. MaricicJ. MartinoT. MatsubaraG. MentionA. MeregagliaM. MeyerT. MileticR. MilincicH. MiyataTh. A. MuellerY. NagasakaK. NakajimaP. NovellaM. ObolenskyL. OberauerA. OnillonA. OsbornI. OstrovskiyC. PalomaresI. M. PepeS. PerassoP. PerrinP. PfahlerA. PortaW. PotzelG. PronostJ. ReichenbacherB. ReinholdA. RemotoM. RöhlingR. RoncinS. RothB. RyboltY. SakamotoR. SantorelliF. SatoS. SchönertS. SchoppmannT. SchwetzM. H. ShaevitzD. ShresthaJ. -L. SidaV. SinevM. SkorokhvatovE. SmithJ. SpitzA. StahlI. StancuL. F. F. StokesM. StraitA. StükenF. SuekaneS. SukhotinT. SumiyoshiY. SunK. TeraoA. TonazzoM. ToupsH. H. Trinh ThiG. ValdiviessoC. VeyssiereS. WagnerH. WatanabeB. WhiteC. WiebuschL. WinslowM. WorcesterM. WurmE. YanovitchF. YermiaV. Zimmer

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.