Paper detail

First-Principles Study on Structural Properties of GeO$_2$ and SiO$_2$ under Compression and Expansion Pressure

The detailed analysis of the structural variations of three GeO$_2$ and SiO$_2$ polymorphs ($α$-quartz, $α$-cristobalite, and rutile) under compression and expansion pressure is reported. First-principles total-energy calculations reveal that the rutile structure is the most stable phase among the phases of GeO$_2$, while SiO$_2$ preferentially forms quartz. GeO$_4$ tetrahedras of quartz and cristobalite GeO$_2$ phases at the equilibrium volume are more significantly distorted than those of SiO$_2$. Moreover, in the case of quartz GeO$_2$ and cristobalite GeO$_2$, all O-Ge-O bond angles vary when the volume of the GeO$_2$ bulk changes from the equilibrium point, which causes further deformation of tetrahedra. In contrast, the tilt angle formed by Si-O-Si in SiO$_2$ markedly changes. This flexibility of the O-Ge-O bonds reduces the stress at the Ge/GeO$_2$ interface due to the lattice-constant mismatch and results in the low defective interface observed in the experiments [Matsubara \textit{et al.}: Appl. Phys. Lett. \textbf{93} (2008) 032104; Hosoi \textit{et al.}: Appl. Phys. Lett. \textbf{94} (2009) 202112].

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.