Paper detail

First-principles study of native point defects in topological insulator Bi$_2$Se$_3$

The \emph{p}-type Bi$_{2}$Se$_{3}$ is much desirable as a promising thermoelectric material and topological insulator, while the naturally grown Bi$_{2}$Se$_{3}$ is always \emph{n}-type doped by native point defects. Here we use first-principles calculations to identify the origin of the \emph{n}-type tendency in bulk Bi$_{2}$Se$_{3}$: The Se vacancies (V$_\text{Se1}$ and V$_\text{Se2}$) and Se$_{\text{Bi}}$ antisite dominate the donorlike doping with low formation energy, while the predisposed Bi$_{\text{Se1}}$ defect results in the pair of V$_\text{Se1}$ and Bi interstitial, which is also a donor rather than an acceptor. Moreover, for Bi$_{2}$Se$_{3}$(111) surface, we find that the band structures modulated by the defects explicitly account for the existing experimental observations of \emph{n}-type preference.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.