Paper detail

First-principles study of defect formation energies in LaO$X$S$_2$ ($X=$ Sb, Bi)

We theoretically investigate defect formation energies in LaO$X$S$_2$ ($X=$Sb, Bi) using first-principles calculation. We find that the oxygen vacancy is relatively stable, where its formation energy is higher in $X=$ Sb than in $X=$ Bi. An interesting feature of $X=$ Sb is that the vacancy of the in-plane sulfur atom becomes more stable than in $X=$ Bi, caused by the formation of an Sb$_2$ dimer and the electron occupation of the impurity energy levels. The formation energies of cation defects and anion-cation antisite defects are positive for the chemical equilibrium condition used in this study. Fluorine likely replaces oxygen, and its defect formation energy is negative for both $X=$ Sb and Bi, while that for $X=$ Sb is much higher than $X=$ Bi. Our study clarifies the stability of several point defects and suggests that the in-plane structural instability is enhanced in $X=$ Sb, which seems to affect a structural change caused by some in-plane point defects.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.