Paper detail

First-principles studies of the effects of impurities on the ionic and electronic conduction in LiFePO$_{4}$

Olivine-type LiFePO$_{4}$ is widely considered as a candidate for Li-ion battery electrodes, yet its applicability in the pristine state is limited due to poor ionic and electronic conduction. Doping can be employed to enhance the material's electrical conductivity. However, this should be understood as incorporating electrically active impurities to manipulate the concentration of native point defects such as lithium vacancies and small hole polarons which are responsible for ionic and electronic conduction, respectively, and {\it not} as generating band-like carriers. Possible effects of monovalent (Na, K, Cu, and Ag), divalent (Mg and Zn), trivalent (Al), tetravalent (Zr, C, and Si), and pentavalent (V and Nb) impurities on the ionic and electronic conductivities of LiFePO$_{4}$ are analyzed based on results from first-principles density-functional theory calculations. We identify impurities that are effective (or ineffective) at enhancing the concentration of lithium vacancies or small hole polarons. Based on our studies, we discuss specific strategies for enhancing the electrical conductivity in LiFePO$_{4}$ and provide suggestions for further experimental studies.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.