Paper detail

First-principles-based calculation of branching ratio for 5$\boldsymbol{d}$, 4$\boldsymbol{d}$, and 3$\boldsymbol{d}$ transition metal systems

A new first-principles computation scheme to calculate `branching ratio' has been applied to various $5d$, $4d$, and $3d$ transition metal elements and compounds. This recently suggested method is based on a theory which assumes the atomic core hole interacting barely with valence electrons. While it provides an efficient way to calculate the experimentally measurable quantity without generating spectrum itself, its reliability and applicability should be carefully examined especially for the light transition metal systems. Here we select 36 different materials and compare the calculation results with experimental data. It is found that our scheme well describes 5$d$ and 4$d$ transition metal systems whereas, for 3$d$ materials, the difference between the calculation and experiment is quite significant. It is attributed to the neglect of core-valence interaction whose energy scale is comparable with the spin-orbit coupling of core $p$ orbitals.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.