Paper detail

FIRE-DES++: Enhanced Online Pruning of Base Classifiers for Dynamic Ensemble Selection

Despite being very effective in several classification tasks, Dynamic Ensemble Selection (DES) techniques can select classifiers that classify all samples in the region of competence as being from the same class. The Frienemy Indecision REgion DES (FIRE-DES) tackles this problem by pre-selecting classifiers that correctly classify at least one pair of samples from different classes in the region of competence of the test sample. However, FIRE-DES applies the pre-selection for the classification of a test sample if and only if its region of competence is composed of samples from different classes (indecision region), even though this criterion is not reliable for determining if a test sample is located close to the borders of classes (true indecision region) when the region of competence is obtained using classical nearest neighbors approach. Because of that, FIRE-DES mistakes noisy regions for true indecision regions, leading to the pre-selection of incompetent classifiers, and mistakes true indecision regions for safe regions, leaving samples in such regions without any pre-selection. To tackle these issues, we propose the FIRE-DES++, an enhanced FIRE-DES that removes noise and reduces the overlap of classes in the validation set; and defines the region of competence using an equal number of samples of each class, avoiding selecting a region of competence with samples of a single class. Experiments are conducted using FIRE-DES++ with 8 different dynamic selection techniques on 64 classification datasets. Experimental results show that FIRE-DES++ increases the classification performance of all DES techniques considered in this work, outperforming FIRE-DES with 7 out of the 8 DES techniques, and outperforming state-of-the-art DES frameworks.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.