Paper detail

Finite sample bounds for expected number of false rejections under martingale dependence with applications to FDR

Much effort has been made to improve the famous step up test of Benjamini and Hochberg given by linear critical values $\frac{iα}{n}$. It is pointed out by Gavrilov, Benjamini and Sarkar that step down multiple tests based on the critical values $β_i=\frac{iα}{n+1-i(1-α)}$ still control the false discovery rate (FDR) at the upper bound $α$ under basic independence assumptions. Since that result in not longer true for step up tests or dependent single tests, a big discussion about the corresponding FDR starts in the literature. The present paper establishes finite sample formulas and bounds for the FDR and the expected number of false rejections for multiple tests using critical values $β_i$ under martingale and reverse martingale dependence models. It is pointed out that martingale methods are natural tools for the treatment of local FDR estimators which are closely connected to the present coefficients $β_i.$ The martingale approach also yields new results and further inside for the special basic independence model.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.