Paper detail

Finite groups with an automorphism inverting, squaring or cubing a non-negligible fraction of elements

There are various results in the literature which are part of the general philosophy that a finite group for which a certain parameter (for example, the number of conjugacy classes or the maximum number of elements inverted, squared or cubed by a single automorphism) is large enough must be close to being abelian. In this paper, we show the following: Fix a real number $ρ$ with $0<ρ\leq 1$. Then a finite group $G$ with an automorphism inverting or squaring at least $ρ|G|$ of the elements in $G$ is "almost abelian" in the sense that both the index and the derived length of the solvable radical of $G$ are bounded. Furthermore, if $G$ has an automorphism cubing at least $ρ|G|$ of the elements in $G$, then $G$ is "almost solvable" in the sense that the index of the solvable radical of $G$ is bounded.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.