Paper detail

Finding Strength in Weakness: Learning to Separate Sounds with Weak Supervision

While there has been much recent progress using deep learning techniques to separate speech and music audio signals, these systems typically require large collections of isolated sources during the training process. When extending audio source separation algorithms to more general domains such as environmental monitoring, it may not be possible to obtain isolated signals for training. Here, we propose objective functions and network architectures that enable training a source separation system with weak labels. In this scenario, weak labels are defined in contrast with strong time-frequency (TF) labels such as those obtained from isolated sources, and refer either to frame-level weak labels where one only has access to the time periods when different sources are active in an audio mixture, or to clip-level weak labels that only indicate the presence or absence of sounds in an entire audio clip. We train a separator that estimates a TF mask for each type of sound event, using a sound event classifier as an assessor of the separator's performance to bridge the gap between the TF-level separation and the ground truth weak labels only available at the frame or clip level. Our objective function requires the classifier applied to a separated source to assign high probability to the class corresponding to that source and low probability to all other classes. The objective function also enforces that the separated sources sum up to the mixture. We benchmark the performance of our algorithm using synthetic mixtures of overlapping events created from a database of sounds recorded in urban environments. Compared to training a network using isolated sources, our model achieves somewhat lower but still significant SI-SDR improvement, even in scenarios with significant sound event overlap.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.