Paper detail

Filter-based Discriminative Autoencoders for Children Speech Recognition

Children speech recognition is indispensable but challenging due to the diversity of children's speech. In this paper, we propose a filter-based discriminative autoencoder for acoustic modeling. To filter out the influence of various speaker types and pitches, auxiliary information of the speaker and pitch features is input into the encoder together with the acoustic features to generate phonetic embeddings. In the training phase, the decoder uses the auxiliary information and the phonetic embedding extracted by the encoder to reconstruct the input acoustic features. The autoencoder is trained by simultaneously minimizing the ASR loss and feature reconstruction error. The framework can make the phonetic embedding purer, resulting in more accurate senone (triphone-state) scores. Evaluated on the test set of the CMU Kids corpus, our system achieves a 7.8% relative WER reduction compared to the baseline system. In the domain adaptation experiment, our system also outperforms the baseline system on the British-accent PF-STAR task.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.