Paper detail

Filling metric spaces

We prove a new version of isoperimetric inequality: Given a positive real $m$, a Banach space $B$, a closed subset $Y$ of metric space $X$ and a continuous map $f:Y \rightarrow B$ with $f(Y)$ compact $$\inf_FHC_{m+1}(F(X))\leq c(m)HC_m(f(Y))^{\frac{m+1}{m}},$$ where $HC_m$ denotes the $m$-dimensional Hausdorff content, the infimum is taken over the set of all continuous maps $F:X\longrightarrow B$ such that $F(y)=f(y)$ for all $y\in Y$, and $c(m)$ depends only on $m$. Moreover, one can find $F$ with a nearly minimal $HC_{m+1}$ such that its image lies in the $C(m)HC_m(f(Y))^{1\over m}$-neighbourhood of $f(Y)$ with the exception of a subset with zero $(m+1)$-dimensional Hausdorff measure. The paper also contains a very general coarea inequality for Hausdorff content and its modifications. As an application we demonstrate an inequality conjectured by Larry Guth that relates the $m$-dimensional Hausdorff content of a compact metric space with its $(m-1)$-dimensional Urysohn width. We show that this result implies new systolic inequalities that both strengthen the classical Gromov's systolic inequality for essential Riemannian manifolds and extend this inequality to a wider class of non-simply connected manifolds.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.