Paper detail

Fighting Fish: enumerative properties

Fighting fish were very recently introduced by the authors as combinatorial structures made of square tiles that form two dimensional branching surfaces. A main feature of these fighting fish is that the area of uniform random fish of size $n$ scales like $n^{5/4}$ as opposed to the typical $n^{3/2}$ area behavior of the staircase or direct convex polyominoes that they generalize. In this extended abstract we concentrate on enumerative properties of fighting fish: in particular we provide a new decomposition and we show that the number of fighting fish with $i$ left lower free edges and $j$ right lower free edges is equal to \begin{equation*} \frac{(2i+j-2)!(2j+i-2)!}{i!j!(2i-1)!(2j-1)!}. \end{equation*} These numbers are known to count rooted planar non-separable maps with $i+1$ vertices and $j+1$ faces, or two-stack-sortable permutations with respect to ascending and descending runs, or left ternary trees with respect to vertices with even and odd abscissa. However we have been unable until now to provide any explicit bijection between our fish and such structures. Instead we provide new refined generating series for left ternary trees to prove further equidistribution results.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.