Paper detail

Ferromagnetism of transition metals and screened exchange interactions

We have investigated the magnetic properties of Fe, Co, and Ni at finite temperatures on the basis of the first-principles dynamical coherent potential approximation (CPA) in order to clarify the role of the exchange interaction energy ($J$) screened by {\it sp} electrons and its applicability to finite-temperature magnetism. With use of the atomic $J$, we obtained the Curie temperatures ($T_{\rm C}$) 1930 K for Fe and 2550 K for fcc Co, which are overestimated by a factor of 1.8 as compared with the experimental values, while we obtained $T_{\rm C}=620$ K for Ni being in good agreement with the experiment. Calculated effective Bohr magneton numbers also quantitatively agree with the experimental values. By comparing the results with those obtained by the screened $J$ and by comparing them with the experiments, we found that the screened $J$, which are reduced by 30% as compared with the atomic ones, improve the ground-state magnetizations and densities of states at low temperatures in Fe and fcc Co, as well as $T_{\rm C}$ in fcc Co. But the screened $J$ yield worse results for finite temperature properties of Fe and underestimate both the ground-state magnetization and $T_{\rm C}$ in case of Ni. We discuss possible origins for these inconsistencies.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.