Paper detail

Fermi arcs vs hole pockets: periodization of a cellular two-band model

It is still debated whether the low-doping Fermi surface of cuprates is composed of hole pockets or of disconnected Fermi arcs. Results from cellular dynamical mean field theory (c-DMFT) support the Fermi arcs hypothesis by predicting corresponding Fermi arcs for the Hubbard model. Here, we introduce a simple parametrization of the self-energy, in the spirit of Yang-Rice-Zhang theory, and show that state of the art c-CDMFT calculations cannot give a definitive answer to the question of Fermi arcs vs holes pockets, and this, independently of the periodization (cumulant or Green's function) used to display spectral weights of the infinite lattice. Indeed, when our model is restricted to a cluster and periodized like in c-DMFT, only two adjustable parameters suffice to reproduce the qualitative details of the frequency and momentum dependence of the low energy c-DMFT spectral weight for both periodizations. In other words, even though our starting model has a Fermi surface composed of hole and electron pockets, it leads to Fermi arcs when restricted to a cluster and periodized like in c-DMFT. We provide a new "compact tiling" scheme to recover the hole and electron pockets of our starting non-interacting lattice model, suggesting that better periodization schemes might exist.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.