Paper detail

Federated learning with incremental clustering for heterogeneous data

Federated learning enables different parties to collaboratively build a global model under the orchestration of a server while keeping the training data on clients' devices. However, performance is affected when clients have heterogeneous data. To cope with this problem, we assume that despite data heterogeneity, there are groups of clients who have similar data distributions that can be clustered. In previous approaches, in order to cluster clients the server requires clients to send their parameters simultaneously. However, this can be problematic in a context where there is a significant number of participants that may have limited availability. To prevent such a bottleneck, we propose FLIC (Federated Learning with Incremental Clustering), in which the server exploits the updates sent by clients during federated training instead of asking them to send their parameters simultaneously. Hence no additional communications between the server and the clients are necessary other than what classical federated learning requires. We empirically demonstrate for various non-IID cases that our approach successfully splits clients into groups following the same data distributions. We also identify the limitations of FLIC by studying its capability to partition clients at the early stages of the federated learning process efficiently. We further address attacks on models as a form of data heterogeneity and empirically show that FLIC is a robust defense against poisoning attacks even when the proportion of malicious clients is higher than 50\%.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.