Paper detail

Feature Selection for Huge Data via Minipatch Learning

Feature selection often leads to increased model interpretability, faster computation, and improved model performance by discarding irrelevant or redundant features. While feature selection is a well-studied problem with many widely-used techniques, there are typically two key challenges: i) many existing approaches become computationally intractable in huge-data settings with millions of observations and features; and ii) the statistical accuracy of selected features degrades in high-noise, high-correlation settings, thus hindering reliable model interpretation. We tackle these problems by proposing Stable Minipatch Selection (STAMPS) and Adaptive STAMPS (AdaSTAMPS). These are meta-algorithms that build ensembles of selection events of base feature selectors trained on many tiny, (adaptively-chosen) random subsets of both the observations and features of the data, which we call minipatches. Our approaches are general and can be employed with a variety of existing feature selection strategies and machine learning techniques. In addition, we provide theoretical insights on STAMPS and empirically demonstrate that our approaches, especially AdaSTAMPS, dominate competing methods in terms of feature selection accuracy and computational time.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.